Thesis On Race In America - flyer online essay
Thesis statement for Racism in America? | Yahoo Answers
In addition to shaping the methods used to address the drug problem, the rhetoric of war also shaped the impact of those methods, for a war requires not only military strategies, but an enemy as well. For the constituency the Reagan Administration was trying to reach, it was easy to construct African Americans, Hispanics, and other people of color as the enemy in the War on Drugs. These are the groups that the majority of white Americans have always viewed as the sources of vice and crime. Reagan's anti- drug rhetoric was skillfully designed to tap into deeply held cultural attitudes about people of color and their links to drug use and other illicit behavior. According to mass communications scholar William Elwood, Reagan's rhetorical declaration of a war on drugs had a deliberate political effect. In Elwood's view, 'Such rhetoric allows presidents to appear as strong leaders who are tough on crime and concerned about domestic issues and is strategically ambiguous to portray urban minorities as responsible for problems related to the drug war and for resolving such problems.' Thus, the origins of the drug war can be traced to shifting public attitudes toward drugs in the early 1980s. President Reagan sought to exploit this change in attitude through a public relations campaign that promised to wage 'war on drugs.' As the metaphor of war might suggest, the War on Drugs required both weapons and enemies. A punitive law enforcement policy of prohibition and interdiction provided the weapons and, while the professed enemies of the War on Drugs were drug cartels in drug source countries, those most affected were people of color in inner city neighborhoods, chiefly African Americans and Hispanics.
22/05/2008 · Thesis statement for Racism in America
Underlying my obsession with this paradox was a premise which I nowbelieve to be mistaken -- that being an authentic black person involvesin some elemental way seeing oneself as an object of mistreatment by whitepeople, while participating in a collective consciousness of that mistreatmentwith other black people. As long as I believed that my personal identityas a black American was necessarily connected to our country's historyof racial violation, and derived much of its content from my sharing withother blacks in a recollection of and struggle against this violation,I was destined to be in a bind. For, as my evolving understanding of ourhistory began to clash with the black consensus, and my definition of thestruggle took on a different, more conservative form from that popularamong other black intellectuals, I found myself cut off from the group,my racial bona fides in question. I was therefore forced to choose betweenmy intellectual integrity and my access to that collective consciousnessof racial violation and shared experience of struggle which I saw as essentialto my black identity. Like Woody, lacking social confirmation of my subjectivesense of self, I was left uncertain about who I really was.