My Essay: Murstein 1972 matching hypothesis …

The matching hypothesis is a theory proposed byWalster et al. in 1966, it suggests why people become attracted totheir . It claims that people aremore likely to form long standing with those who areequally as theyare.

Murstein 1972 Matching Hypothesis

The method used in this experiment was very similar to that of Murstein’s matching hypothesis, ..
Photo provided by

Talk:Matching hypothesis - Wikipedia

Walster and Walster (1969) ran a follow up to the ComputerDance, but instead allowed participants to meet beforehand in orderto give them greater chance to interact and think about their idealqualities in a partner. The study had greater ecological validitythan the original study, and the finding was that partners thatwere similar in terms of physical attractiveness expressed the mostliking for each other – a finding that supports the matchinghypothesis.

Psychology coursework - Matching hypothesis. ? | …

Murstein (1972) also found evidence that supported the matchinghypothesis: photos of dating and engaged couples were rated interms of attractiveness. A definite tendency was found for couplesof similar attractiveness to date or engage.

How can the Matching Hypothesis be proposed by Murstein in 1970 and be tested by Walster in 1966
Photo provided by

Forming Relationships and the Matching Hypothesis - …

Huston (1976) argued that the evidence for the matchinghypothesis didn’t come from matching but instead on the tendency ofpeople to avoid rejection hence choose someone similarly attractiveto themselves, to avoid being rejected by someone more attractivethan themselves. Huston attempted to prove this by showingparticipants photos of people who had already indicated that theywould accept the participant as a partner. The participant usuallychose the person rated as most attractive; however, the study hasvery flawed ecological validity as the relationship was certain,and in real life people wouldn’t be certain hence are still morelikely to choose someone of equal attractiveness to avoid possiblerejection.

Forming Relationships and the Matching Hypothesis ..

Brown (1986) argued for the matching hypothesis, but maintainedthat it results from a learned sense of what is ‘fitting’ – weadjust our expectation of a partner in line with what we believe wehave to offer others, instead of a fear of rejection.

Murstein s matching hypothesis - …

Walster advertised a “Computer Match Dance”. 752student participants were rated on physical attractiveness by fourindependent judges, as a measure of .Participants were asked to fill in a questionnaire, supposedly forthe purposes of computer pairing but actually used to ratesimilarity. Instead, participants were randomly paired, except noman was paired with a taller woman. During the dance, participantswere asked to rate their date. It was found that the moreattractive students were favoured as dates over the less attractivestudents, and physical attractiveness was found to be the mostimportant factor, over intelligence and personality. Although itshowed that physical attractiveness was a factor, it had no effecton the partner so this study did not support the hypothesis.

04/01/2018 · Re-Examining the Matching Hypothesis

An example of the photographs used is in appendix 5
STandardised Instructions
Each participant was taken into a separate room to complete the task, away from the distractions of other students.

Psychology coursework - Matching hypothesis. ? | Yahoo …

However, the study lacks : interactionwas very brief between participants, hence any judgement was likelyto have been of superficial characteristics. The short durationbetween meeting and rating their partner also reduced the chance ofrejection. Finally, because only students were used asparticipants, the sample is not representative of the wholepopulation. In a follow up study six months after the dance, it wasfound that partners who were similar in terms of physicalattractiveness were more likely to have continued dating: a findingthat supports the matching hypothesis.