The evidence of this investigation supports the matching hypothesis.

Shaw Taylor performed a series of studies involving the matching hypothesis in online dating. In one of the studies, the attractiveness of 60 males and 60 females were measured and their interactions were monitored. The people with whom they interacted were then monitored to see who they interacted with, and returned messages to. What they found was different from the original construct of matching. People contacted others who were significantly more attractive than they were. However it was found that the person was more likely to reply if they were closer to the same level of attractiveness. This study supported matching but not as something that is intentional.

The Matching Hypothesis by Stephanie Hine on Prezi

02/09/2015 · Murstein, 1972, supported the matching hypothesis

Matching hypothesis explained - …



One real world application for this study is for online dating sites - the server could match people on their percieved attractiveness
The Matching Hypothesis
Wills & Kate
Participants:
In the study an opportunity sample was used of the people found in the IT suite in the 6th form centre.

Matching Hypothesis Essay Example for Free - …





Extraneous variables:
Age - the participants are all between the ages of 16 and 18
Time of day - not all participants were asked at the same time of day, or on the same day
Many participants had already carried out the experiments of people of others classes; some of these experiments bearing similarities to our experiment
Privacy - the participants were all in the 6th form centre in the same room when we were asking them - conferring

Thank you for watching
our presentation
Right to withdraw
may be a relevant problem to the study as people may feel uncomfortable rating people on a scale of attractiveness, this is overcome by making sure they know they have the right to withdraw at any point in the study, even after the study has taken place they can withdraw their data
Protection from harm
is overcome by giving them a full debriefing to return them to their previous psychological state
Confidentiality
is relevant because people may prefer to keep their preferences private; because of this we did not ask for names or other personal details and we only collected data that’s relevant to the study
Informed consent
- it may be hard to get fully informed consent because of deception
Deception
is relevant because knowing the true aim of the study may affect the answers given: we gave the participants a debriefing, and give them the right to withdraw their results after the study has taken place
Elaine Hatfield proposed the ‘matching hypothesis’ in 1966.

05/01/2018 · The matching hypothesis is derived from the discipline of ..

Matching Hypothesis | Encyclopedia of Psychology

Huston (1976) argued that the evidence for the matchinghypothesis didn’t come from matching but instead on the tendency ofpeople to avoid rejection hence choose someone similarly attractiveto themselves, to avoid being rejected by someone more attractivethan themselves. Huston attempted to prove this by showingparticipants photos of people who had already indicated that theywould accept the participant as a partner. The participant usuallychose the person rated as most attractive; however, the study hasvery flawed ecological validity as the relationship was certain,and in real life people wouldn’t be certain hence are still morelikely to choose someone of equal attractiveness to avoid possiblerejection.

The method used in this experiment was very similar to that of Murstein’s matching hypothesis, ..

supporting predictions of the matching hypothesis

Further evidence supporting the matching hypothesis was found bySilverman (1971); Berschied et al. (1971); Dion and Berschied(1974) and Berschied and Walster et al. (1974). Indeed, Price andVandenberg (1979) stated that “the matching phenomenon [of physicalattractiveness between marriage partners] is stable within andacross generations”.

This does not mean that the exchange theory is an explanation for the matching hypothesis, ..

to explain his Matching Hypothesis

Murstein also found evidence that supported the matching hypothesis. Photos of 197 couples in various statuses of relationship (from casually dating to married), were rated in terms of attractiveness by eight judges. Each person was photographed separately. The judges did not know which photographs went together within romantic partnerships. The ratings from the judges supported the matching hypothesis.

01/01/1988 · The matching hypothesis (also known as the matching ..

Matching hypothesis : Wikis (The Full Wiki)

Brown argued for the matching hypothesis, but maintained that it results from a learned sense of what is "fitting" – we adjust our expectation of a partner in line with what we believe we have to offer others, instead of a fear of rejection.