Employee in privacy statement thesis workplace
Thesis Statement For Right To Privacy - ANP Media
A number of commentators defend views of privacy that link closelywith accounts stressing privacy as required for intimacy, emphasizingnot just intimacy but also more generally the importance of developingdiverse interpersonal relationships with others. Rachels (1975)acknowledges there is no single answer to the question why privacy isimportant to us, because it can be necessary to protect one’s assetsor interests, or to protect one from embarrassment, or to protect oneagainst the deleterious consequences of information leaks, to namejust a few. Nevertheless, he explicitly criticizes Thomson’sreductionist view, and urges that privacy is a distinctive right. Onhis view, privacy is necessary to maintain a variety of socialrelationships, not just intimate ones. Privacy accords us the abilityto control who knows what about us and who has access to us, andthereby allows us to vary our behavior with different people so thatwe may maintain and control our various social relationships, many ofwhich will not be intimate. An intriguing part of Rachels’ analysis ofprivacy is that it emphasizes ways in which privacy is not merelylimited to control over information. Our ability to control bothinformation and access to us allows us to control our relationshipswith others. Hence privacy is also connected to our behavior andactivities.
Employee Privacy Rights in the Workplace Essay - 1531 …
Carefully reviewing these various views, Anita Allen (1988) alsocharacterizes privacy as denoting a degree of inaccessibility ofpersons, their mental states, and information about them to the sensesand surveillance of others. She views seclusion, solitude, secrecy,confidentiality, and anonymity as forms of privacy. She also urges thatprivacy is required by the liberal ideals of personhood, and theparticipation of citizens as equals. While her view appears to besimilar to Gavison’s, Allen suggests her restricted access view isbroader than Gavison’s. This is in part because Allen emphasizes thatin public and private women experience privacy losses that are uniqueto their gender. Noting that privacy is neither a presumptive moralevil nor an unquestionable moral good, Allen nevertheless defends moreextensive privacy protection for women in morality and the law. Usingexamples such as sexual harassment, victim anonymity in rape cases, andreproductive freedom, Allen emphasizes the moral significance ofextending privacy protection for women. In some ways her account can beviewed as one reply to the feminist critique of privacy, allowing thatprivacy can be a shield for abuse, but can also be so valuable forwomen that privacy protection should be enhanced, not diminished.