Healing AIDS and HIV Naturally with a Drug-free …

The Duesberg hypothesis is the claim,associated with professor , that variousnon-infectious factors such as andpharmaceutical drug use are the cause of , and that (human immunodeficiency virus) is a harmless .The most prominent defenders of this hypothesis are Duesberghimself, and vitamin proponent , and journalist . Themajority of the considersthat Duesberg's arguments are the result of predominantly outdatedscientific data andselectively ignoring evidence in favour of HIV's role in AIDS.There is broad that theDuesberg hypothesis is incorrect, and that HIV is the cause ofAIDS.

Healing AIDS and HIV Naturally with a Drug-free Approach

To fund or not to fund, that is the question: proposed experiments on the drug-AIDS hypothesis.

Misconceptions about HIV/AIDS - Wikipedia

Setting the focus of all AIDS efforts on HIV, a virus that strains the rules of biology,epidemiology and logic, has rendered humankind few, if any, beneficial results.
The lives of over 400,000 Americans have been given to the notionthat HIV is the only possible cause of AIDS, and that toxic drugs offer the only possible prevention,treatment, or hope for cure. Many more lives have been forever altered by a positive result on anon-standardized test for harmless antibodies that may or may not be associated with HIV.
More than $50 billion in federal AIDS funding has provided nosignificant understanding of HIV, has produced no safe and effective therapies, and has not broughtus any closer to ending AIDS. Instead, we have constructed a powerful AIDS establishment thatregulates our news, limits our access to information, and demands an ever greater allocation of ourresources and support. Rather than helping to resolve AIDS, we have funded the growth ofmulti-billion dollar industries, institutions and organizations that depend on AIDS and on ourcontinued devotion to the narrow and unproductive HIV hypothesis. (2000, p. 61)

International Chapters | Drug War Facts

The key to the AIDS-drug hypothesis is that only long-term consumption causes irreversibleAIDS-defining diseases, whereas occasional or short-term drug use causes reversiblediseases or no diseases at all. And different drugs cause different infections. The long ‘latent period’ of HIV is a euphemism for the time needed toaccumulate the drug dosage sufficient to severely damage the immune system. It takes 20 years ofsmoking to acquire irreversible lung cancer or emphysema, and 20 years of drinking to acquireirreversible liver cirrhosis. If it takes about 10 years of nitrites, heroin, amphetamines, or cocaine todevelop AIDS, then AIDS is a consequence of the drug epidemic that started in America in the late1960s during the Vietnam War. The much more toxic drug AZT can cause AIDS within a year. Thevirus hypothesis fails to explain why AIDS is linked to drugs or why the risk of AIDS depends on thelifetime dosage of drugs. The fact that 85% of AIDS-causing drugs are used by males, particularly sexuallyactive homosexuals between 25 and 49 years of age, explains why about 80% of westernAIDS patients are males.

A Brief History- Duesberg on AIDS

A large followed a group of 715 menin the area; approximately halfwere HIV-seropositive or became so during the follow-up period, andthe remainder were HIV-seronegative. After more than 8 years offollow-up, despite similar rates of drug use, sexual contact, andother supposed risk factors in both groups, only the HIV-positivegroup suffered from .Similarly, counts dropped in thepatients who were HIV-infected, but remained stable in theHIV-negative patients, in spite of similar rates of riskbehavior.The authors concluded that "the risk-AIDS hypothesis... is clearlyrejected by our data", and that "...The evidence supports thehypothesis that HIV-1 has an integral role in the CD4 depletion andprogressive immune dysfunction that characterise AIDS."

HIV/AIDS Hypothesis Questioned ..

Several studies have specifically addressed Duesberg's claimthat recreational drug abuse or were responsible for the manifestations of AIDS. Anearly study of his claims, published in in 1993, found Duesberg's drugabuse-AIDS hypothesis to have "no basis in fact".

21/06/1994 · Inventing the AIDS Virus

Duesberg notes that diseases associated with AIDS differ between African and Western populations, concluding that the causes of immunodeficiency must be different. is much more commonly diagnosed among AIDS patients in Africa than in Western countries, while conforms to the opposite pattern. Tuberculosis, though, had higher prevalence in Africa than in the West before the spread of HIV. In Africa and the United States, HIV has spurred a similar percentage increase in tuberculosis cases. PCP may be underestimated in Africa: since machinery "required for accurate testing is relatively rare in many resource-poor areas, including large parts of Africa, PCP is likely to be underdiagnosed in Africa. Consistent with this hypothesis, studies that report the highest rates of PCP in Africa are those that use the most advanced diagnostic methods" Duesberg also claims that is "exclusively diagnosed in male homosexual risk groups using nitrite inhalants and other psychoactive drugs as aphrodisiacs", but the cancer is fairly common among heterosexuals in some parts of Africa, and is found in heterosexuals in the United States as well.