How to use antithesis in a sentence
How To Recognize Meaningless Rhetoric From Masters …
Despite these seemingly self-evident statements of absolute determinism, however, Hegelclearly recognized that contingency continued to exist in the world. He concurred that"chance occurrences" were indeed a part of history, but did not see them as anactive or even particularly noteworthy element. They simply were not significant in termsof what really mattered: the meaning of history itself.
How To Recognize Meaningless Rhetoric From Masters Of ..
Arthur Schopenhauer was among the first 19th centuryphilosophers to contend that at its core, the universe is not arational place. Inspired by Plato and Kant, both of whom regarded theworld as being more amenable to reason, Schopenhauer developed theirphilosophies into an instinct-recognizing and ultimately asceticoutlook, emphasizing that in the face of a world filled with endlessstrife, we ought to minimize our natural desires for the sake ofachieving a more tranquil frame of mind and a disposition towardsuniversal beneficence. Often considered to be a thoroughgoingpessimist, Schopenhauer in fact advocated ways — via artistic,moral and ascetic forms of awareness — to overcome afrustration-filled and fundamentally painful human condition. Sincehis death in 1860, his philosophy has had a special attraction forthose who wonder about life’s meaning, along with those engagedin music, literature, and the visual arts.
Literary Devices | Literary Terms
For instance, the same wind could be cold to oneperson and hot to another. The extent to which Protagoras’sview, or at least what comes down to us from Plato, amounts togenuine relativism remains somewhat controversial. As Burnyeat(1976b: 172) notes, Sextus Empiricus thought—though Burnyeatthinks mistakenly—that the Protagorean measure doctrine was tobe understood as the subjectivist thesis thatevery appearance is true (simpliciter). This kindof radical subjectivism, though, quickly can be shown to turn onitself: it can appear that the thesis that “everyappearance is true” is false. And so this radical subjectivistinterpretation, regardless of whether it is accurate, is as Sextushad thought, untenable. However, Plato also ascribes a social orethical dimension to Protagorean relativism which seem to go beyondindividualistic subjectivism. In Theaetetus 172a 2–6he says