according to the green world hypothesis

Let me begin to pick up the pieces by pointing out that terms like "human energy field", "vibrational medicine", and "energy imbalance" are simply meaningless and that the use of "Einstein's Theory" to justify healing-at-a-distance is typical of people who don't have a clue about what science actually is. The meaningless misuse of scientific terms and the uninformed and careless misapplication of scientific techniques is an activity called pseudo-science. Pseudo-science may sound and look like science, but the two have almost nothing else in common. Among the benefits of a good college education is learning how vast is the world of human knowledge, recognizing how little you know of that world, discovering how much others have already thought about everything you can imagine, and finding out how dangerous it is to venture unprepared into any area you do not know well. Most of these pseudo-scientific quacks are either oblivious of their own ignorance or so arrogant that they dismiss the work of others as not worthy of their attention. Either way, they make terrible students and, consequently, useless teachers. You'll do best to leave their books on the shelves.

what is green world hypothesis? | Yahoo Answers

Another theoretical tenet is Trampe’s (2001) idea of a language-world-system.

the limits of my language mean the limits of my world

Others put the cause down to intermixturewith Neanderthals. Yet, according to the mtDNA that has beenretrieved, no genetic continuity is discernible between lateNeanderthals and early modern Europeans. Perhaps there was somegene flow between the two groups, but certainly not enough toaccount for the large number of Europeans with neither black hairnor brown eyes.

green world hypothesis (Ecology) | Food Web | Soil

This allows for the continuous creation, change and deletion of words and concepts as language follows the cultural system set up by the description of the world around the language users.

According to them industrial society is like a cancerspreading through a global host.
These values areindependent of the usefulness of the nonhuman world for humanpurposes.2.3.4..5.

Fifteen years after the end of the Second World War, ..

of Darwin's original theory is thatit could not explain where "new" features (really, old features,butdramatically changed ones) came from - natural variationscouldn't really explain how snake venom evolved from salivary proteins, forinstance. But many years later, in work mostly with fruit flies, werediscovered: spontaneous changes in genetic material,producing new alleles that produced new variations on traits. Soonit was found that x-rays could induce mutations, with greater doses makingmore changes. consider any change inDNA, whether it is in genes or not, to be a mutation, and it is known that mutationsto a gene will usually have no effect on the codedtrait, will tend to have a bad effect if an effect exists, butoccasionally will produce a valuable change. And aparticular type of mutation from crossing over can produce duplicate genesin offspring, allowing for the mutational change of an existing trait (say,snake saliva to venom through changes of the "extra"saliva gene) while preserving the original action (not losing theoriginal saliva protein). This might also explain why more"advanced" organisms seemed to have more genes than more"primitive" ones. worksthese two ways - coding is redundant (for reasons covered when the detailsof code-to-protein are covered) and is hard to effectively alter, and"extra" or redundant genes may be produced. The extragenes, according to, have at least 4 functions if they are not shut off ordeleted: they can help produce more of the coded protein; theycan be available to perform if the "original" fails; they can become involved in differential expression, allowing fine-tunedregulation of production (especially in multi-step chemical pathways); and they can develop a new function, possibly dramatically different fromthe original, which was mentioned above as important to evolutionary"jumps."

These materials, according to Krashen and Terrell, are based not just on teacher perceptions but on elicited student needs and interests.

The world map according to the hair colour of world leaders

The debate still continues and there is a growing literature builtaround the many issues raised by it. Aydede (1997a) offers an extensiveanalysis of the debate between classicists and this group ofconnectionists with special attention to the conceptual underpinningsof the debate. (See also Roth 2005 who argues that to the extent to which connectionist models can transform representations successfully according to an algorithmic function, to that extent they count as executing program in the sense relevant to classical program execution.) Aydede argues that both parties are wrong in assuming thatconcatenative realization is relevant to the characterization of LOTH. Part of the argument is that concatenative realization of (B) is just that—a realization. The attentive reader might have noticed that there is nothing in the characterization of (B) that requires concatenative realization. Indeed, when we look at all the major arguments for LOTH focused on the need for (B), none of them requires concatenation or explicit realization of syntactic structure. In fact, it is almost on the border of confusion to necessarily associate LOTH to such an implementational level issue. If anything, this class of connectionist networks, if successful and generalizable across all higher cognition, contributes to our understanding of how radically differently a LOTH architecture could be implemented in neural networks. Indeed, if these models prove to be adequate for explaining the full range of human cognitive capacities, they would show how syntactically structured representations and structure sensitive processes could be implemented in a radically new way. So research programs in this niche are by no means trivial or insignificant. But we need to be clear and careful about what minimally needs to be the case for LOTH to be true, and why.

Humans,as a destructive pest species, must have their population tightlycontrolled, and even significantly reduced according to some:

Welcome to Wood Green – The World According To Jo

DeepEcology is a semi-religious movement that believes moderncivilisation’s anthropocentric (human-centered) worldview isthe root cause of an imminent complete ecological collapse.